Clinician examining a patient with a stethoscope. Credit: Photo: Wikimedia Commons. License: Creative Commons (confirm exact license). Use the hero only alongside this paper; honor the image’s own license.
Abstract
A vendor-neutral methodology for verifying physician and HCP credentials in market-research sample — a four-tier evidence ladder from self-report to primary-source registry match, where verification happens across the respondent lifecycle, and how credentialing differs across EU, UK, and US markets. Grounded in the EphMRA Code, ESOMAR 37, and ISO 20252.
A four-tier evidence ladder from self-report to primary-source registry match, where verification happens across the respondent lifecycle, and how credentialing differs across EU, UK, and US markets.
Edit for your house style, but please keep the meaning intact (no material modification) and credit CatalystMR with a canonical link back.
Cite this
APA
CatalystMR Research Team. (2026). Credible Physician Sample — Verifying Healthcare-Professional Credentials (Methodology Paper No. 132). CatalystMR. https://www.catalystmr.com/insights/methodology-papers/physician-sample-verification/
BibTeX
@techreport{catalystmr_mp132,
author = {{CatalystMR Research Team}},
title = {Credible Physician Sample — Verifying Healthcare-Professional Credentials},
institution = {CatalystMR},
type = {Methodology Paper},
number = {No. 132},
year = {2026},
url = {https://www.catalystmr.com/insights/methodology-papers/physician-sample-verification/}
}
RIS
TY - RPRT
AU - CatalystMR Research Team
TI - Credible Physician Sample — Verifying Healthcare-Professional Credentials
T2 - CatalystMR Methodology Papers
PB - CatalystMR
PY - 2026
M1 - No. 132
UR - https://www.catalystmr.com/insights/methodology-papers/physician-sample-verification/
ER -
Republishing is welcome under our publisher license: keep attribution, set rel=canonical back to the CatalystMR URL above, and don’t materially alter the text. Use only the real CatalystMR logo — don’t recolor or redraw it.